blog/content/posts-en/deng-dai-ge-duo.md

title, pubDate, category, tags, pinned, mood, bookAuthor, description, cover, hidden, draft, locked

title	pubDate	category	tags	pinned	mood	bookAuthor	description	cover	hidden	draft	locked
Waiting for Godot	2026-03-31	reading	read	false	#b45309	萨缪尔·贝克特	无望之待里，陪伴是囚笼唯一的呼吸缝隙。	./assets/等待戈多.png	false	false	true

Who Is Godot? Why Wait?

Hopeless Waiting: Self-Salvation and the Predicament of the Cage

Godot is the character who runs through the entire book, yet not one person has ever seen him. Gogo and Didi simply go on waiting for Godot. Is Godot a kind of hope? Or perhaps a kind of faith? As the waiting drags on, it can leave Gogo and Didi indifferent even to life itself — they even treat suicide as a way of whiling away the hours of waiting. What, then, is the meaning of waiting for Godot? Is it not a hope for living, but a spiritual pursuit, a form of redemption? Or has waiting for Godot already become their only purpose in life — they no longer know what the waiting means, but waiting for Godot is the only thing left for them to do, the only straw to clutch at in escaping reality. Whether Godot exists no longer matters; what matters is the act of "waiting" itself, which has become the physiological rhythm by which they confirm that they have not yet come completely apart.

Perhaps Godot does not exist at all. Godot is simply a way for Gogo and Didi to escape the real world — the only way they can feel they still have something to do. It is an absurd kind of waiting, a waiting utterly without meaning. The process of waiting is itself absurd: Gogo and Didi seem to wait for the sake of waiting, and the waiting becomes a stretch of utterly barren time. They do not know what to do; they do not know how to pass the hours of waiting. They simply wait, waiting for Godot.

The way human beings keep themselves alive amid meaninglessness is rarely a spectacular act of rebellion; more often it is the trivial, repetitive, even laughable persistence of daily routine. This is both a compromise and a kind of tragic resilience. Yet why keep clinging to this meaningless waiting — why not bravely go to death, or break the status quo and follow time as it flows away, instead of being trapped in this moment, trapped in the past? Perhaps dying takes resolve, and breaking out takes a direction. And when both have been drained away, "waiting" becomes the only verb still left to execute.

Didi keeps interrogating the past, seeking consistency within time; Gogo wants only to live in the present. We are forever torn between "trying to sort out meaning" and "being able only to endure the moment at hand". No one lives in the future, for it seems that no one has a future at all: the future is only waiting — forever living inside waiting, inside the same waiting repeated day after day. Within that day-after-day repetition, everyone resists the real world and their own life in a way uniquely their own, living with time and fighting against it, as if to prove that they still exist, that what they are doing still means something.

So, under this absurd life — time keeps passing all the same. What should we do? With what should we confront the void? When waiting becomes fate, when the future is diluted into a repeated "tomorrow", with what bearing should we face this time that is bound to slip away?

Between Withering and Blooming: The Anchor of Memory and the Flow of Time

There are five characters in the play, yet only Didi seems truly awake — only he remembers the past, remembers what happened yesterday. Gogo, Pozzo, Lucky, and the Boy remember nothing of yesterday; they seem to live forever in the present. In reality, time has been flowing all along: the tree putting out green leaves means that everything is still moving forward. They live in the present, but they have witnessed the past, and they are stepping toward the future — only the step always lands on a repeated today, much like the ever-repeated talk of hanging. Going to death is merely one way of passing the time; they lack the courage for any real death.

Lucky's long, disordered speech in the play reads like a requiem for a collapsing reason, and like a mirror of absurdity. When Lucky is ordered to think, his monologue begins within a logical framework, citing all kinds of terminology, but it soon sinks into chaos — words piling up without order or method. It is as if people wanted to fight absurdity with reason, wanted to explain, by thinking, a world that has itself lost its logic — but every such effort is futile, and everything must return to nothingness in the end.

Seen the other way round, Didi's lucidity is like another form of Lucky: he keeps trying to piece together yesterday out of fragments of memory — a yesterday that no longer exists in anyone else's memory. No one remembers yesterday; only Didi does. Didi sets memory against the passing of time — painful but awake; Gogo dissolves the weight with hope — numb but at ease; for the others, time simply does not exist to begin with, an absurdity carried to its extreme. The bare tree grows leaves, bearing witness to the world's change, while the human situation keeps circling in the same place. Didi sees the passing of time with perfect clarity, yet he remains trapped in time's cage, and all he can do is still to wait, quietly, for Godot.

A tree can stand bare, or it can put out leaves;
Waiting can be futile, or it can be the proof of existence;
Memory can be a burden, or it can be an anchor;
Absurdity can be despair, or it can be the starting point of freedom.

Perhaps in an absurd world, in a life of nothingness, there is sometimes no need to "defeat" the void. Sometimes, "continuing" is itself the meaning. Just like that tree — between withering and blooming, therein lies the answer.

---

• Estragon: (after thinking for a good while) What you are saying is the exact opposite of what I said, is that it? Vladimir: It's a question of temperament. Estragon: Of character. Vladimir: There is nothing anyone can do about it. Estragon: Striving is no use. Vladimir: One is what one is born to be. Estragon: Struggling is no use either. Vladimir: Rivers and mountains may change, but a man's nature never does.

• The more people I meet, the happier I am. Even in dealings with the lowliest of men, you can feel yourself gaining in knowledge, enriching your experience, tasting happiness all the better.

• The tears of the world hold to a fixed measure. Somewhere someone weeps, and somewhere else someone must stop weeping. The same holds for laughter. (He laughs.) So let us not speak ill of our times: it is no worse than the times before it. (Silence.) Nor let us speak well of it.

• Without him, my thinking, my feeling, would no doubt have stayed confined to mediocre trifles, to the vulgar business of keeping a family fed — nothing that mattered in the least. As for supreme beauty, supreme goodness, supreme truth, I could never reach them; I know full well I am not worthy of them.

• What is there about it that is so extraordinary? That it is the sky itself? It is pale and bright, like the sky anywhere at this hour of the day. (Pause.) The same sky, in the same quarter.

• The light suddenly fails. In a moment the sky turns black. The moon rises at the far end of the stage, climbs high into the sky, stops dead, and sheds its silver light over the stage.

• People do not need us every day of the year; to be honest, people do not precisely need us. Others could do these things too — if not better, at least as well. The cry for help we have just heard might rather be said to have been addressed to all mankind. But at this place, at this hour, mankind is us two, whether we like it or not. Let us make the most of it, before it is too late. Since ill fortune has swept us in among this shameless rabble, let us for once represent them worthily. Truly, when we stand with folded arms weighing profit and loss, we are no less worthy of the conditions of our existence. A tiger will rush without a thought to the aid of its own kind — or else it flees into the deepest jungle. But that is not the question. What we are doing here — that is the question we must put to ourselves. And we are fortunate in knowing the answer: yes, in the midst of this immense confusion one thing alone is clear — we are waiting for Godot to come.

---

---